ProPR and Greptile: review findings that become commits

Greptile reviews every PR against a graph of the whole codebase and hands findings to an agent you run locally. ProPR owns the loop around that review, from plan to PR to follow-up commits on your server.

Greptile

Finding to commit

Greptile reviews the pull request and leaves the commit to you. ProPR creates the pull request and keeps committing to it after review.

Greptile pathExisting pull request → codebase-graph review → Fix with your AgentThe finding goes to your local agent, and you commit the result.

ProPR pathPlan → isolated workspace → GitHub PR → follow-up commitProPR opens the pull request, then turns findings into commits on the branch.

Greptile builds a graph of the repository, every function, class, and dependency, and reviews each pull request against it. Its TREX agent runs the PR branch in a sandbox, exercises the application, and posts logs, screenshots, and video. "Fix with your Agent" sends a finding to Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or another local agent, which applies the change for you to commit. Greptile works with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Gitea, prices reviews in credits with a free Starter tier, and offers a self-hosted, air-gapped deployment on its Enterprise plan.

ProPR owns the implementation path around that review: planning the change, running the agent in isolation, opening the PR, and turning findings into follow-up commits on the branch. The two coexist: Greptile reviews the PR that ProPR opened, and ProPR turns the feedback into commits.

A review run on the pull request, scored 6 with two issues: it read the diff against the issue and checked the sticky summary on every checkout step — A /review run reads the diff against the issue and posts scored findings; /fix turns them into the next commit on the branch.

PR review versus comment-to-commit follow-through.

Question	Greptile	ProPR
License and deployment	Proprietary; cloud, or self-hosted on Enterprise	Apache 2.0, self-hosted
Review existing PRs with codebase context	Yes, plus TREX sandbox runs	Yes, `/review` with a second model
Plan and create the PR before review	No	Yes
Turn PR feedback into commits	Hands the finding to your local agent; you commit	Any plain comment or `/fix`
Git hosts	GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gitea	GitHub only

Greptile fits best when...

You need deep, codebase-aware review on existing PRs, including runtime checks in a sandbox.
Implementation already happens elsewhere and review depth is the gap.
Your repositories live on GitLab, Bitbucket, or Gitea as well as GitHub.

ProPR fits best when...

One system plans the change, runs the agent, and opens the PR.
Review findings become commits: /review posts findings, /fix applies them on the branch.
You want both: Greptile reviews the PRs that ProPR opens and keeps revising.

Verified November 2026: Greptile introduction, TREX overview, Fix with your Agent, code providers, self-hosting, pricing.

Use Greptile with ProPR.

Stays in Greptile

Codebase-graph review on every pull request, with TREX sandbox runs, logs, screenshots, and video.
Review on GitLab, Bitbucket, and Gitea repositories, where ProPR does not reach.

Moves to ProPR

The plan and the implementation before the pull request exists, on your server with the agent you choose.
Turning a finding into a commit: a plain comment on the PR instead of handing the finding to a local agent and committing yourself.
Task history, logs, and usage for every run.

Wire them together

Install ProPR and keep Greptile installed

Run propr setup (quickstart) or pick a ProPR Hosted plan, add the repository, and sign in your agent. Greptile keeps its GitHub installation.

Let ProPR open the pull request

Add the AI label to an issue and approve the plan. Greptile reviews the pull request ProPR opens, as it does any other.

Turn findings into commits

Quote the finding in a plain comment and ProPR pushes the commit, unattended. /review and /fix add a second model's findings on the same branch. The follow-up playbook shows one comment becoming a commit.